All Headlines >>
An annual dog licence fee of as little as £21.501 could help reduce the number of strays and help tackle irresponsible dog breeding, according to a new RSPCA report released today.
Owners would face a cost of less than 42p a week per dog, in order to provide huge improvements to dog welfare and dog control services.
The report - 'Improving dog ownership - The economic case for dog licensing' - suggests a licensing scheme could deliver resources to improve dog welfare worth in excess of £107.4 million1. With an estimated 10 million dogs in Britain2, this works out at £21.50 per dog with a compliance rate of 50 per cent1. A compliance rate of 75 per cent would work out even less at £14.30 per dog1.
The new report was written by the RSPCA's director of communications David Bowles and is based on research by Reading University, which was commissioned by the Society.
It makes three recommendations in its conclusion:
David said: "Now is the right time to invest in the future health and welfare of Britain's dogs. A dog licence would raise money which could be targeted into improving enforcement of laws at a local level, improve the welfare of dogs and reverse the use of certain breeds of dogs as a status symbol or weapon.
"The dog licence would achieve three important goals. It would raise money for dog welfare, increase the numbers of responsible dog owners by getting people to think before they get a dog and start to reverse the surplus of dogs on the market by providing incentives such as reduced fees for neutering dogs."
He added that the costs are given as an indication of what the licence fee could cover, and a dog licensing scheme could in reality be set at between £20-30 per dog per year - between only three and four per cent of the annual costs of owning a typical breed of dog.
Twenty-three countries in Europe currently have a dog licence or registration scheme3. In some countries, such as Germany, Slovenia and the Netherlands, the RSPCA says there have been improved dog control provisions and low numbers of strays with compliance rates of more than 50 per cent.
David said: "The RSPCA believes that Britain has slipped behind other countries which have started to tackle and solve the problems of dog over supply and only the introduction of a dog licence could ensure we catch up.
"In countries which have a dog licence it is seen not as a tax, but as an important part of owning a dog. In Britain we know that a dog licence is welcomed by two out of every three dog owners, more than 70 per cent of who are happy to pay more than £30 for the pleasure and responsibility of owning a dog."
References1. Figures taken from Table 2, p16, Improving dog ownership - The economic case for dog licensing (see below).2. Murray, J.K., Browne, W.J., Roberts, M.A., Whitmarsh A. And Gruffydd-Jones T.J. (2010) Number and ownership profiles of cats and dogs in the UK. The Veterinary Records 166: 163-168.3. Tasker, L. (2007) Stray Animal Control Practices (Europe). WSPA and RSPCA.
PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vet nurses.
I would like to know the type of people who took part in the survey - and i bet it wasnt the people who attend charity clinics and begrudge leaving even a small donation for treatment which may run to 100's of pounds. How many of these people are included in 'the more than 70% that would be happy to pay more than £30 for the pleasure and responsibility of owning a dog'?
And if there are so many people who are happy to pay this amount then why are the charity clinics so busy at the moment?
What would be more useful is to work out the % of dogs seen in private practice v the % of dogs seen in charity practice and to take a representative sample dependant on those percentages - then I think the number of people expressing happiness at the cost will be very much lower. Ultimately a survey however it is carried out can be made to say whatever the client wants it to say whilst the reality can be so much different. I have no doubt the responsible pet owners will be in the majority of people paying - but what about the others?
I think compulsory microchipping is a better way around this at the moment ( but again difficult to enforce) and only when this has been implemented for a number of years to bring in a dog license.
How much money was spent on this survey? considering the RSPCA are pleading poverty?
i agree something needs to be done, but the people their aiming at, are they gonna bother paying for a licence? or like normal the responsible owners going to get punished because of others.
I agree 100% that we need a dog licence and compulsory chipping. I would happily pay that amount to have my dogs, andI would hope it would be a step in the right direction towards prevention of over breeding. Having a cheaper rate for neutered dogs, and pensioners is a great plan, and I would say for rescued rather than speacially bred dogs too would be good