All Headlines >>
John Kenward MRCVS, a director of Maidstone practice Pet Emergency Treatment Services, has been given a conditional discharge for allowing an employee to X-ray her own foot after a horse stamped on it.
Maidstone Magistrates heard that the employee, a 25 year-old vet and equine intern, was afraid the foot was broken and she might be unable to do that evening's on-call duty.
As a result, she rang Mr Kenward. As they were both concerned she could be held up in hospital A&E, Mr Kenward suggested she use the in-house X-ray kit. He gave her the settings to use and she carried out the test, which showed no break so she continued to work as normal.
Another director, who acts as Radiation Protection Supervisor, later noticed a human image on the digital processor. This led him to notify other practice board members of his intention to interview staff about the suspected breach of site radiation safety policy. He was immediately told by Mr Kenward not to discipline the vet intern as he had suggested that she use the X-ray.
As a result the Health and Safety Executive was contacted and an investigation confirmed a breach of radiation regulations.
Although the vet intern, from Maidstone, was the only person present during the X-ray exposure, she did not wear a personal dosemeter during the procedure.
However, HSE told the court that Mr Kenward was fully aware that the rules of the practice clearly stated nobody should be placed within the beam of the X-ray machine.
Mr Kenward was ordered to pay £1,296 in costs after admitting a breach of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974.
After the hearing, HSE inspector Rob Hassell said: "Any vet practice using ionising radiation for medical exposures must ensure that the X-ray equipment is properly maintained and that the requirements of the Ionising Radiations Regulations are complied with. The view of HSE and the Department of Health is that it is highly unlikely that all these conditions can be met by a veterinary practice.
"It follows therefore that X-rays must not be taken of human beings at practices. We are aware that the X-raying of people may not be unique to this particular practice so I hope others will take note that HSE is prepared to prosecute if such breaches come to light."
PS: Whilst you're here, take a moment to see our latest job opportunities for vet nurses.
Silly autocorrect/typo ☺️☺️☺️
sounds like a cheery place to work - 'Et tu Brute?'
Nick, that's a great typo! I think if you turned up and said you'd x-rated your foot, they'd send you somewhere completely different!
Under IR(ME)R, which is the Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations, which stipulates who can and can't expose another human to infusing radiation. A vet or even a nurse is not considered a suitably qualified person to undertake this exposure. Therefore they are breaking the law. The exposure of animals to ionising radiation is governed by the Ionising Radiation Regukations. Also part of your local rules will state that you are not to expose other members of staff to ionising radiation. The correct procedure was followed by the RPS and this serve as a warning to others in the future. This may sound petty but leave it to the professionals who are suitably qualified to undertake the examination. Also what are you going to do if you spot something. Turn up at A&E and say I've broken my foot cos I've x-rated it...,,
I don't think its very good practice to x-ray humans in a vets, but I do think it's a bit cheeky for the HSE to say that it is highly unlikely a vet practice would be unable to "properly maintain" x-ray equipment.